Caveat : Free Prior Informed Consent : Emptor
SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST
Respectfully Published By : SQYX : Editor-In-Chief +1NC ICG
FEB 19TH, 2025
Canada, as an originating party to the UN Charter - and a transitioning member from the League of Nations; as well as a member of NATO & CIIIR Commonwealth (Of Nations) is rightfully aggrieved by the POTUS 2025 breach of the USMCA by imposing extraordinary tariffs outside of the provisions of the peaceful tri nation trade agreement - which was signatured during the POTUS 2016 administration.
Hence, Canada, as a matter of national security may choose to notify POTUS 2025 that Canada is cancelling the NORAD agreement; rather concentrating upon the NATO agreement; plus, the security and assistance available via the Commonwealth (of nations).
In considering the above matters, this author, herein, has considered UN Charter, Chapter VII due to the unfolding "annexation" threats percolating from the POTUS 2025 Oval Office. And, further, it is quite evident that the US withdrawal from the Rome Statute does endanger global peace : i.e., disavowing the ICC jurisdiction.
And, The United States has a complex relationship with the International Court of Justice (ICJ). While the U.S. recognizes the ICJ as a principal judicial organ of the United Nations, it does not accept the court’s compulsory jurisdiction. This means that the U.S. only participates in ICJ cases on a voluntary basis and when it consents to the court’s jurisdiction for specific cases12. The U.S. withdrew from the ICJ’s compulsory jurisdiction in 1986 following a ruling against it in a case brought by Nicaragua1. Since then, the U.S. has engaged with the ICJ selectively, often challenging the court’s jurisdiction in contentious cases2.
Regards,
